Friday, January 22, 2010

Danny Kortchmar Tells Fall Out Boy To 'Get Off My Lawn!'

As much as I enjoy reading the Lefsetz Letter, there’s always a prevailing sense of fogeyism lodged in between the articles of technology, the end of days of the recording industry and the constant reminders to people throughout the record industry to shit or get off the pot in terms of how they market their product.
And it is about product in Bob’s mind-a number one like Vampire Weekend’s current offering, Contra, isn’t really a “hit” based on the tepid sales figures. Ten or so years ago, the sales results that Contra is putting up wouldn’t be enough to earn a #1 spot. Letsetz points this out in a way that occasionally borders on hostility-I mean have you actually seen pictures of Vampire Weekend? They’re not the kind of kids that are going to put up much of a fight, so why bother taking a swing at them with the “let’s see what sales they can do next week” kind of post.
We all know that it’s going to fall off the radar from here on out and it will probably struggle to get near gold status. The fact that everyone’s talking about them and they can only throw up a little over 100,000 in one week speaks little to the band’s hype machine but it speaks volume of how fragmented all of the outlets are in actually getting the word out to the mainstream.
They’re not, but you know what, neither is radio, network television, magazines, etc. etc.
The real story is Heidi Montag’s dismal debut of “Superficial” which posted 658 copies last week.

Where are the gloves there?
The song practically begs to be given an internet beatdown because it actually declares that Heidi “rock(s) the latest fashions and I set the latest trends” when-after looking at those embarrassing totals-she obviously doesn’t.
And then there are the occasional emails that Lefsetz receives, like a recent one by Danny Kortchmar:

Hey Bob,
Fuck all this bullshit….
A message to the Killers ..the yeah yeah yeahs .. mgmt…fall out boy..etc..try writing ONE song that has the power and truth of The Pretender, or Millworker by JT, or anything by Bruce or "Not Dark Yet" by Dylan or "Won’t Get Fooled Again…how ’bout it,"Monsters Of Folk? Do you have enough ass in your britches?
Don’t look like it…
The Supreme Court just decided to turn over the whole policital process to the corporations…any one got any thing to say about that? Ting Tings? Killers? Lady Gaga? Anyone?
It’s not bad enough that our leaders are of no help…where are the "artists"?
If you have nothing to say except "look at me" then… fuck you…remember when music used to mean something? Get your head out your collecitive asses and write something that speaks to the hearts of men (and women) or go away..
DK


For those of you not familiar with Mr. Kortchmar’s work, he’s a notable guitarist who’s played with many famously talented people. You can check out his work on Tapestry, which should be enough to get you to understand that he was kind of a big deal.
But am I the only one sensing a bit case of fogeyism with Kortchmar’s apparent displeasure over some of alternative rock’s most notable artists? I know, it’s hilarious how he lumps Killers and Fall Out Boy into an obvious disconnect as to what’s hip, but it’s bizarre how he chastises those artists to produce something on the level of Jackson Brown, Bob Dylan, Bruce Springsteen, and James Taylor.
By the way, Kortchmar was actually a part of James Taylor’s first band-the Original Flying Machine. The band was in their twenties, a war was raging and the political process was in disarray. Kortchmar and Taylor were actually around the same age as those artists that he recently lambasted.
So what were they doing to “speak to the hearts of men?”
They were knockin’ around the zoo on a Thursday afternoon according to one song. On another, they declared themselves to be night owls who enjoyed sleeping all day long. And Kortchmar-in an act that screams “look at me”-wrote a song and titled it “Kootch’s Song.”
It’s presumptuous and fairly egotistical to believe that music no longer means something today, and I may add it's common to hear baby boomers lecture other generations about doing more after squandering their own beliefs of the sixties.
Most people Danny's age are more like their Eisenhower loving fathers than they were.
Kortchmar sounds like he feels entitled to light a fire under the younger generation’s ass to do something while he couldn't find a Bic to burn his own to actually get up and find the exact kind of music he’s throwing a temper tantrum about. It's out there, but like an old man in the gaming section of Best Buy, he doesn't know where to find it.
His idea of who rock’s left-field spokespersons are is skewed because his fact checkin’ cuz is Rolling Stone, Billboard, that Spin he bought in the airport on the way back to Martha’s Fucking Vineyard, and the curmudgeon commentary of Bob Leftsez.
So why don’t you go fuck off yourself, Kootch. I’m paying for your goddamn social security benefits and I am tired of hearing your generation’s opinion on things that it has no business on offering its “advice” on.
Just look at the shit that you've started.

And by the way, nice dick move that you and Taylor pulled on the Flying Machine album. You want full album price on just an ep’s worth of false starts and studio chatter wrapped around three or four mediocre sock hop rock songs?
The ass in your britches reeks of adult undergarments and sour grapes.

6 comments:

Charles Hoffman said...

Great stuff Todd. I get so tired of the self-importance of the "boomers" and the attitude that their 60s/70s day in the sun was some kind of American cultural/artistic nadir. I don't know if Danny Kortchmar has noticed, but people from his generation have been pretty much in charge of the major record labels for years, and look at the great new artists with so much important stuff to say they've been bringing us.

By the way do you follow @FakeBobLefsetz on twitter?

Kiko Jones said...

Bob Lefsetz annoys the fuck out of me. So, it actually pains me to come to his defense. But I think you're overreacting to his assessment of VW's first week sales. I don't feel he's belittling or de-legitimizing Contra's numbers but rather, bemoaning the pathetic state of a music business where these kinds of numbers are enough for a top Billboard slot. Personally, I wish he were more antagonistic (he did call their records "pretty good" after all) towards those he accurately describes as "...just another hipster band that’s caught fire with the…Brooklyn hipsters", but this ain't personal. He does give Heidi Montag as much "ink" as he does VW, but the difference is certain people take VW seriously, while Montag is a joke even to those who follow her. She's also too easy a target. Lady Gaga, on the other hand...

As for Kortchmar's letter, we can hate on him for being a condescending boomer, for perhaps being a hypocrite, etc. But is he wrong? In a an era of highly disposable, marketing dept conceived pop stars; where a significant amount of the music-consuming populace REFUSES to pay for an artist's work; and the only mainstream acts that dare to write protest songs are almost exclusively boomers; is he wrong? I don't think so.

What he perhaps is unaware of are the many artists that represent the kind of artistry he feels is missing out there. I'm sure Kootch would probably dig someone like, say, Iron & Wine, one of the shining lights of the last 10 years. But, by and large, these are not folks in or known by the mainstream; they are not the "name" artists of our day. So Kootch, whether we like it/him or not, sadly, is right.

Charles Hoffman said...

Very true, for the most part, Kiko, although with respect to a lack of non-boomer "mainstream" artists writing protest songs, Green Day might differ with you there. Not that they manage to resonate with me though.

I've thought along similar lines before, how there are artists out there that Lefsetz (and Kooch) would be likely to really like and consider as examples of the kind of artistry that Lefsetz spends so many words decrying the lack of in today's music, but that you have to dig a little below the mainstream. There's so much music being made today, and people have a limited amount of time/attention to devote to it, even people who make it their business to keep up on the music industry. To keep up on the non-mainstream involves a choice to mostly ignore big-business music. Perhaps the reason that big-business music seems to be in such trouble is because more and more people are making that decision. I'm reminded of this and this. Given that so few musical releases bother to report to things like SoundScan now, who should cares about the sales numbers that Lefsetz analyzes? Yet he chooses to pay attention to big-business music, which is less and less representative of the real music industry.

Bob and Kooch probably would like Iron & Wine. They'd probably like Dears, or Richard Buckner, or The Magnetic Fields. But come to think of it, those aren't even the mainstream of "indie" which has gotten just as trendy as anything. Lately it seems like I see a new faux-folky "hey look an accordion" indoe band being hyped every day.

Kiko Jones said...

You're on the money regarding Green Day, Chuck. But I think you'll agree they are an exception. (Btw, GD's more socially oriented stuff seemed more vital to me than a lot of their other stuff and brought my attention to their music for the first time in a long while.)

And yeah, indie artists like I&W or--off the top of my head--American Music Club, among quite a few others, are not trendy but I feel their music will be around long after the "hip" acts are forgotten.

Cheers.

Kiko Jones said...

Also, I just wanted to add that, in my personal experience, this kind of benign ignorance on Kootch's part is cyclical: I remember in the '80s how older friends of mine would bemoan the state of popular music only to be pleasantly surprised when I turned them on to the likes of The Cure, R.E.M., The Smiths, etc.

Then in the '90s, a few classic rock fans of my acquaintance actually reconsidered their entrenched stance once they opened their ears and let themselves be exposed to new artists that eventually resonated with them.

You are absolutely right Chuck, about there being "...so much music being made today, and people [having] a limited amount of time/attention to devote to it...[keeping] up on the non-mainstream involves a choice to mostly ignore big-business music."

But one could argue that there are now quite a few sites that can point you in the right direction. I humbly would suggest to Kootch and anyone else out there to apply my old magazine-digging approach to the 21st century: find a writer online you generally agree with and take it from there. Right?

Charles Hoffman said...

Right.