data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2bdd/e2bddfc3c17eeb94447d55ac349049cb91d7c34d" alt=""
But of all things, my Mother-in-Law seems to be making an effort to understanding as evidenced by a Christmas present that wasn’t on any list.
She said that she had read my post on the Bruce Springsteen documentary, where I confessed that I never owned Darkness On The Edge Of Town and that I’d probably seek out the re-issue set sometime later.
Instead of doing the obvious-merely ordering that newly issued edition-she sought out an original vinyl edition. Not only that, but the copy I ended up getting was a sealed copy, complete with the promotional sticker “Contains ‘Badlands’.”
Now I’m at a dilemma: break the seal and listen to the record just like I would have in 1978, or keep it sealed. I do have one of those album cover picture frame things where the shrink-wrapped album could be displayed nicely, but it almost seems like defaulting on the integrity of the music of Christmas past.
I would always retreat and listen to my presents, absorbing whatever information I could about the gift.
It’s not about wanting the value to keep increasing on the album-I don’t think Darkness is that rare of a commodity-but it’s not every day where you can find a sealed record that’s over thirty years old.
Whatever the decision, it’s a great gift and it reminded me how something, which may seem insignificant to others, still means a lot to me.
Share your own Christmas music booty in the comments.
1 comment:
That's an awesome move by your mother-in-law. My personal feelings at this point are, "It's not the thought that counts if no thought has been out into it." I wrote a much longer response but deleted it as I prefer to tell you it over the phone.
Post a Comment